Erenlai - Displaying items by tag: cultural diversity
Monday, 11 August 2008 20:52

Movies and cultural diversity

Yesterday morning, as I was riding my bicycle on my way to the supermarket, a group of teenagers started screaming at me in English: “Hello, Mister!” “How are you, Mister?” I was first amused to see young people so eager to demonstrate their English proficiency, but this comic encounter left me later with a bitter aftertaste: one more time in Taiwan, I was mistaken for an American. Not that I have anything against my dear friends from the United States, but it is always somewhat frustrating to picture yourself through other people’s stereotypes.

Stereotypes are maybe one of the most widely shared features of human beings, and on this issue a Frenchie like me has nothing to pride himself about. As I was making fun of this Taiwanese equation that “White” equals “American”, I realised that I also had my share of misconceptions about foreigners. For instance, it took me quite a long time to realise that Asian people living in Paris were not all Chinese, and it is only after several years that I realized that the fried spring rolls that I had been eating with delight in Asian restaurants was not a Chinese dish but a Vietnamese one.

I felt somewhat ashamed at the discovery of my own ignorance about foreign habits and ways of life, and this convinced me to launch a crusade against the clichés and items of conventional wisdom that we often take for authentic knowledge about the other. Not an easy task, I must confess. Look at history programs in schools: obsessed with the heroic task of instilling notions of national identity and pride, they leave quite a sparse room for teachings on other cultures and civilisations. So apart from the happy few who can spend their free time travelling around the world, most of us are condemned to rely on media if they wish to learn about other cultures. And here is the bug that bothers me: media are often a distorting mirror of foreign cultures, which are typically reduced to a set of clichés, not always devoid of xenophobic accents.
Another problem is the difficult access to cultural diversity in the media. Take movies for instance. How many non-Hollywood movies have you seen last year? Well, if you live in Taiwan, probably not many. Except for a few institutions such as the Taipei Film House, or for a couple of international movie festivals, it is Hollywood on every menu. The last fifteen years have seen the share of Asian movies shrink in the local box office, and now American big studio productions have the lion’s share in the movie industry revenue: a trend that is not likely to change in the future, considering the lack of policies encouraging cultural diversity.

I had the chance to grow up in Paris, a city that, despite its quite unaffordable living expenses, has the advantage to be crowded with little independent cinemas, where you can see, and usually for a cheap price, movies from other times and places. You might object that my taste for Iranian and Kazakhstan movies is just another illustration of my highbrow cultural tastes, and that I am part of an ultra-minority of snobbish people like me who delight themselves in watching four-hour long Hungarian black and white movies. Well, maybe you are right: after all, why adopt cultural policies that encourage the distribution of movies that nobody is ever going to see? Lots of foreign movies are often quite hermetic to audiences, who do not necessarily share the values and cultural codes embedded in such films. Those who have had the experience of watching a Bollywood movie know what I am talking about.

However, a country does not need to adopt volunteer policies to encourage the display of movies from different cultural horizons: the capitalist logic might be quite a sufficient incentive for that. Take China with its fast developing market for entertainment products: why not produce some movies that display Chinese values and ways of life, and which might be profitable in the Asian market while educating at the same time other folks about an Eastern civilization that is widely unknown to them? Well, I am not the first one to bump into this million-dollar idea: there is a precedent, and it is called Mulan. Mulan: an exemplary story of a girl who enrols in the army to relieve her ageing father; a folk tale that every Chinese person has known from childhood. Mulan seemed to provide the perfect storyline for Disney to enter the Chinese market and sell millions of tickets; however, it performed rather poorly in the Chinese box-office. The reason? Despite all the good will of the filmmakers, despite the overall “oriental” aesthetics of the movie, reflected in its soundtrack or in the drawing style, the movie did not reflect accurately the original meaning of the story. The Chinese makeup did not fool the local audience, who rejected the transplant of Western values on the original script. Mulan, a daughter going to war by filial piety, had become something that spectators could not recognize: a feminist lost in an archaic world of hysterical matrons, a symbol of independence in a universe of male domination.

Cultural hybridity needs a sense of nuance and delicacy that was clearly missed by Mulan producers. More successful in this crossing of cultures are the movies of Ang Lee. Take a traditional Chinese kung-fu novel, and rewrite the script to add the romance elements that captivate Western spectators, and you have Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. The success of this movie lies in the very nuanced and careful way in which the director Ang Lee tried to make the plot understandable for a Western audience without departing from the Chinese elements of the story. As a Taiwanese director that moved early to the United States, Ang Lee has built himself a double culture that enables him to build bridges and new understandings between different value systems. Other directors have taken the same path: think of the way that Emir Kusturica or Tony Gatlif have reconstructed our imaginary representation of gypsy people, traditionally depicted in Europe basically as thieves or social parasites.

Through their written or filmic testimonies, nomadic artists of the 21st century are our best guides to the distant, the foreign, the other. But there is still a lot to be done. In a world where people and cultures are more and more intertwined, we still have too little testimonies of these fascinating or dramatic experiences that can be immigration, exile and cultural hybridism. Immigrants are often the second-class citizens of our globalized world, and although they often live at our doorstep, the lack of representation of these people in our media and objects of popular culture only reinforces the impression that they live in a distant or separate world. I think that the movie industry has a particular responsibility in bringing to us distant cultures that we ignore everything about. After all, films have historically been used quite as a means for National propaganda. It is time that they assume another historical mission: that of introducing to us other cultures and fighting our stereotypes.

 


Monday, 23 July 2007 19:52

Four Overriding Global Concerns

Cultural Diversity, Sustainable Development, Awareness and Responsibility.

In ancient times when people were few, they had to fend for themselves. Survival of one’s immediate family was one’s only concern. Then as external threats multiplied it became expedient for friends and neighbors to join together for mutual support and protection. This led to the formation of clans, tribes and ultimately nations and empires. These clans, tribes and nations were initially held together by common language, common concerns and cultural identity. The bonds between them were strongest when they were unified against belligerent foes. They were weakest in times of peace when everyone’s sole concern was his or her own family and business, which usually led to greed and corruption, selfishness and immorality and ultimately dissolution and defeat. A new nation or empire would arise which now had a new mix of cultural diversity, that of the vanquished joined to that of the conquerors. Eventually each would assimilate the other or they would develop separately in an uneasy truce.

In any case, the world is now blessed with an abundance of races, nations, languages, cultures, religions, political persuasions, and economic systems, in such a way that in almost every region they are intermingled side by side in competition for dominance or just struggling for survival.

Since this is so, one of the overriding global problems of the present day is how to create one world out of many without eliminating any, that is, not how to eliminate or subjugate the various minorities or how to create some new hybrid society, but how to preserve and protect each cultural heritage in the gardens of diversity through mutual respect and interaction and common destiny.

Cultural diversity is not the world’s only concern. Whether personal, tribal, or national, the aim has always been to protect what one possesses and to take what one needs. In times of an abundance of resources this creates no problem at all. One simply grabs what one wants whenever one wants and throws it away whenever it is no longer useful.

Ordinarily there doesn’t seem to be any pressing need to consider the consequences of what one does, especially those that are still far off in a distant future. But nowadays it is becoming more and more evident that the natural resources of materials, minerals and food supplies are quite limited and in some cases nearly exhausted. Furthermore, the indiscriminant disposal of trash and the byproducts of industrialization being pumped into the atmosphere or emptied into rivers or dumped onto or into the ground are polluting the environment, affecting the weather and endangering health. Not only this, it turns out that many of the things we eat are responsible for cancer, calories, and cholesterol, all of which can shorten our lives to say nothing of the smoking, lack of sufficient exercise and improper nutritional balance that also constitute serious threats to our health and well-being.

Thus there is a second overriding global concern of the present day, namely, the exponentially increasing challenges of managing the world’s limited resources, preventing pollution to the environment, and adopting healthier life styles.

It does little good for scientists to expose impending dangers, if no one pays any attention to what they are saying. It is futile for experts to point out solutions, if governments are reluctant to pay for them or hesitate to face the sacrifices that must be made. It is extremely difficult to convince anyone to change the way he or she lives if they aren’t convinced that change is necessary or they would rather take their chances than give up anything or they simply feel that it is not their responsibility.

Thus there is a third overriding global concern of the present day: how to get everyone to see the seriousness of the problems and convince them of their personal responsibility to do their part in prevention and restoration. Until there is a universal cry for help and a universal commitment to action, there is little hope that there will be any significant global reduction of waste and pollution.

This can only come about through two levels of leadership:

1. Strong charismatic leaders at the top whose message and inspiration effectively fire up the government and mobilize the masses;
2. charismatic concerned leaders at the bottom who stir up the masses to demand action and direction from the top.

Both of these efforts are paying off. Some governments more than others are taking steps to preserve dwindling resources and eliminate areas of pollution. In many places the masses are responding to calls for less smoking and better diets and willingly participate in recycling and the use of biodegradable products, etc. But so far these are mainly cosmetic and relatively inexpensive measures. In the matters of global warning, industrial pollution and developing alternate sources of energy there is often little agreement about what to do; there is resistance to change or loss of revenue; there is lack of effective international cooperation and unified effort.

Thus there is a fourth overriding global concern of the present day: how to reach a common consensus about what to do, how to attain international agreement and commitment, how to get national and multinational corporations to sacrifice some of their present profits to make the radical changes necessary to assure future pollution-free, resource-friendly products.

Where do I as an ordinary citizen fit into this picture? As I see it I do have some responsibilities:
1. I should be aware of these problems and keep abreast of current information;
2. I should willingly participate in all public projects such as re-cycling, litter removal, etc.
3. I should see to it that I and those for whom I am responsible use biodegradable materials whenever possible, protect and preserve our own environment, buy and use whenever we can only products that are the least polluting, maintain proper nutritionally balanced healthy diets and exercise, etc.
4. I should vote responsibly and make my concerns and convictions known to those who make and regulate public policies.

If every neighbor cleaned up his or her own yard, the neighborhood would be clean. If every industry reformed itself, the whole city or nation would be transformed. If every nation accepted full responsibility for cleaning up its own air, preserving its own resources and protecting its own environment, the whole globe would benefit. Only if every citizen does his or her part can the nation do fully its part.


{rokbox}media/articles/BobCulturalDiver.jpg{/rokbox}

Thursday, 24 May 2007 09:15

How Culture Transcends Politics

First of all, starting from the position I am holding in Hong Kong since a few years, I ask myself: what do Hong Kong people see in Taiwan, and what attracts them there?
They come to see the cultural values of this place, from Eslite bookstore to small eateries in the mountains, puppet shows of the Huang family, aboriginal people’s songs and craftsmanship, the Hakkas’ flower festival, inns… this is the Taiwan that deserves to be appreciated.
Especially the night life, the night markets of Taiwan attract a lot of Hong Kong people who come to Taiwan for the evening markets of Shilin and Liuhe, the colorful night life and riverside coffee shops of Kaohsiung…

Seen at a first glance, the so-called cultural values seem to be an abstraction, Once they are located in a well-oriented space, most characteristics however find their respective position.。For example say, if “creativity” and ’ “pluralism” (including democracy and the protection of the weakest among us) are considered as two axis, the Taiwan characteristic of discussing, debating that goes within all cultural activities appears out naturally : the Huang family puppet show originates from a variety of cultural currents, showing Taiwan’s pluralism, elasticity and capacity of absorption.
Same thing for the night market with the heterogeneity of its flavors and the plurality of its manifestations.
The experience of the night market life echoes Richard Florida ‘s “The Rise of the Creative Class” (2002) on the characteristics that most awakens the creative mind .

How the stranger sees us is one thing, the other side of the mirror is how we consider ourselves. Considering oneself allows one to go beyond external representations and false pretence. For instance, the idea of “the human rights originating from one’s talent “ originally opposes “the divine right of kings” and the reflection on what “talents” entails has been developed through the Enlightenment. Creativity is not a characteristic of a given place, Margaret Boden in “The creative mind” shows that such mind can indeed improve through practicing. By being conscious that we are a people filled with creativity, we naturally reinforce our creative power.
The founding spirit of every country starts a process of self-reinforcement.
For example say, after the French Revolution, the red blue white three color flag was not an ethnic symbol but was attached to the universal ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity.
The U.S.A., by becoming a melting pot was fulfilling the democratic ideal of its founders and the ideal of human rights enshrined in the Constitution. Also refer to Turner’s “The Significance of Frontier in American History” when it comes to the Western spirit , a mythology that can be adulterated, but, even in its political uses and abuses of today, refers to a founding spirit - and Americans still keep up a dream of youth, progress and heroism.

As to us, Taiwanese, where are the cultural values that define our identity?
If “creativity” and “pluralism” are indeed our cultural characteristics, they also might become a topic for tourism promotion. Becoming “the island of creativity” , “pluralist island”, whether it refers to the experience of going to Eslite, coffee house experience , night market experience (Florida says: for the creative man, “Experience” replaces goods and service as the main consumption item), and recognizing this characteristics as our assets will bring in people from the whole world.
In other words, this is a self-reinforcing characteristic that can be put into practice at the level of community life. Building consensually on these values, accumulating tacitly a certain lifestyle, we, Taiwanese, who are extremely flexible, are able to design and mould the figure of our own culture as perceived everywhere.

In fact, this will allow Taiwanese to display self-confidence too, linking “the island of creativity” with the creativity displayed in the world as a whole. This is a direction full of potentialities as it will allow us to go beyond the stranger’s idea of a Taiwan flowing with money, and also to go against an image built on “hardware” for enhancing the Taiwanese “software’ provided by creativity and pluralism.

Let us turn back to the way Hong Kong, Taipei and Kaohsiung are respectively underestimating each other. Hong Kong is always treating Taiwan with contempt for its messy politics, Taiwan sees Hong Kong as a bird cage, while Hong Kong people, with a functionalist approach, will find the narrow alleys or the humble airport building too unattractive.
Our “island of creativity and pluralism” is actually hurt by over-politicization and by the primacy given to money as a value and means of decision:
Narrow political vocabulary
Vulgarized Confucianism used to consider the relationships between political decision makers and the people on the Father-Son relationships model
In modern time, the willingness to counterbalance the ancient attitude and establish democracy has led to overstate the influence of politics.
Money oriented value system
Commercial values are predominant, standardizing not only products but also demands. “The Disappearance of Childhood” by Neil. Postman was already saying, many years ago , that standardization and brands were threatening the experience of childhood, making the child use the vocabulary of adults and losing creativity.
In our Chinese tradition, the great mission of any individual was to continue the family lineage, and the sense of insecurity created by the possibility of the lineage not continuing was fostering the accumulation of wealth. So far, what Taiwan worries about most is the decline of the economic figures and of having no money. But is it that kind of accumulation that will earn us the respect of the world inhabitants?

If Taiwan indeed nurtures a colorful cultural scenery, then, borrowing the expression of Benoit Vermander, though it cannot become a “normal (ordinary) member”, it might transform itself into a “outstanding (extraordinary) member” of the international community ----This kind of self- understanding is actually what Taiwan can share with other people, and the personnel stationed abroad of Taiwan, could help to popularize and introduce this specific culture. A bolder proposal (forgive me for I am also a creator) would be to merge the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the Ministry of Culture and the Tourism bureau…
Taking again as an example Hong Kong which I comparatively know very well, in November 2006, our centre made great efforts to introduce a “Taiwan month”, overcoming the doubts raised about Taiwan politics, mobilizing Taiwan residents and entrepreneurs, surmounting political divisions, during that month, in the Hong Kong media, the “November-Taiwan month” formula was spread all around, while exchanges naturally developed from heart to heart, and it is worth mentioning that on the ground, the course of arrangement was by itself a creation process, with fundraising being more and more provided by Hong Kong charities proper, and the “creativity of Taiwan” being more and more connected to concerns about Hong Kong local society.
In a word, when looking at Taiwan from the cultural viewpoint, its peculiar vision is displayed by the accumulation of experiences in civil society and democratic politics for so many years now. Think about it: if one day, on the signboards on the buses, train station, performance halls on the each metropolis of the world is on display the creative culture of Taiwan, maybe Taiwan does not need to be worried by the number of its diplomatic allies! Using the cultural card this way, letting Taiwan go to the world, letting the world see Taiwan, this might be the best present to offer to this “island of creativity.”
And going one step further, if in each place in the world cultural pluralism and creativity are the basis for international relations, then, hostility in the world will be reduced, goodwill increased, and cooperation too will increase naturally, reaching the objective of ensuring “world governance”…



Monday, 21 May 2007 00:00

Taiwan and Europe: Past Interactions and Future Pursuits

Much of what we understand of the world, and what we know about the world, derives primarily from what we learn at school. In Taiwan we have known from a very young age about humanity’s four great ancient civilizations, Egyptian, Mesopotamia, Indian and Chinese respectively; later on we also learnt about the development and expansion of the Ancient Greek and Roman civilizations and finally the rise of Europe during the Renaissance. Intense creative activity began in Italy, and it soon spread all over Europe, progressively leading to an unprecedented full scale reform. Europe had stepped on to a well-paved road for development. From then its strength and power dominated the world for several hundred years. Europeans invaded the whole of Asia, coercing many to submit to their power, changing the collective lives and destinies of Asians, the effects of which went far and deep.
 
Our knowledge of Europe for the most part comes from fact. However it is difficult not to mix in an element of imagination. In my opinion, and I believe that many would share my thoughts on this; in terms of technology Europeans are without question superior, with their weapons, power and wealth, they exceed every country. Europeans utilized technology and developed powerful military force. It colonized and controlled vast areas of the world, and coerced many countries into abiding by their laws, and accepting their political hegemony and cultural influence that would be imposed on them and would change their lives.
 
The very first contact between Taiwan and Europe occurred during what can be referred to as an important stage in the history of mankind; the age of discovery. In 1544 a Portuguese fleet on their voyage east-ward along the seas of South-Eastern China, passed through the Taiwan Straits and arrived in Taiwan. As they looked into the distant vast emerald green ranges of Chong Mountain, they shouted ‘Ilha Formosa’. Not long after one after the other, the Spanish, Dutch landed on these shores and established political power, later British and French troops also arrived, and with trading and armed forces came European missionaries, explorers, naturalists. Western buildings, religion also began to appear in Taiwan. Furthermore Europeans began to recognize that Taiwan had its own distinctive Taiwanese local customs and practices.
 
Taiwan is unlike other Asian regions in that it has not been subjected to any direct long tern Western colonialist or Imperialist rule. It was unable however to escape 50 years of Japanese Colonialist rule. The Meiji Restoration saw the end of the Shoguanate Era, the Japenese not only learnt how to build boats and guns from Europe, they also followed Europe’s example in bringing together a democratic system, legislative politics. The Japanese even gathered information about European city infrastructure, art culture and many other areas of new knowledge and values.
 
The 50 years of Japanese rule thoroughly transformed Taiwan and left a profound impact on the lives of Taiwanese people. In other words, in many respects we adopted much of Western Culture through the Japanese, much like how the Japanese adopted Western culture. My father was a painter, he passed the entrance exam to the Tokyo Art School, and was greatly inspired by the Impressionist school; he loved Western art, especially French paintings and French art. I was greatly influenced by my father from quite a young age, and because of this I began to understand another important dimension of European art; artistic creation, in a more narrow sense of the term; culture.
 
The impact of European culture on people was immense. People glorified it, worshipped it. European culture drew people to want to learn more, to gain more knowledge. We are all too familiar with famous European literary works; these have even found their way into Chinese translated versions. Even works of famous European artists have also had their albums published in Chinese (although the quality of the print are not all good); I myself am deeply in love with European classical music and have even done an intensive study in this field. We in many respects want to pursue European popular fashion; we feel that it is an ultimate expression of elegance, luxury, modernism. This kind of mainstream culture dominates our tastes, and often just lap it all up.
 
Whether it was direct or indirect contact, interaction between Taiwan and Europe goes back three to four hundred years. After the Second World War, the Kuomintang government came to Taiwan and the Republic of China firmly took root and exercised its political power on Taiwanese soil. In 1964 France began to establish diplomatic relations with Mainland China, this created a domino effect and shortly after led to all other European countries ending diplomatic relations with Taiwan, leaving Taiwan to turn to the United States. And thus a barrier gradually formed between Taiwan and Europe. Under the ‘Kiss America’ policy American culture began to enter Taiwan in a big way. What is more, faced with the plight of international isolation most young Taiwanese students choose to go to America to study; thus only a very small amount of students would choose to go to Europe for higher education.
 
During the Age of Discovery Taiwan was in fact an important East-Asian stronghold. The mutual surge of interaction and exchange between its own internal culture and external foreign cultures created rich and diversified cultural developments. This was originally a big turning point in the making of ‘New Taiwanese culture’, however the realities at the international stage combined with the autocratic rule of the Kuomintang party greatly influenced any opportunity for a second dialogue between Taiwan and Europe. Another factor being to do with the central principles of Confucius Orthodoxy, inhibiting local native language and culture, making the younger generation uncertain of their own homeland. In fact their knowledge and understanding of the relations between Taiwan and the world can be said to me extremely limited.
 
Under my father’s influence, when I was 16 years old I chose to go to Europe to study music. I passed the entrance exam into a music school in Paris, France. In the place where my idols, great musicians Debussy and Hector Berlioz had resided and learnt, I realized my childhood musical dream. However this so-called musical fantasy was quite unexpectedly crushed on my first day in class by a mean teacher.
 
The majority of the students in my class were French. I still remember when my teacher asked me about my knowledge of music from where I come from, and even asked me to sing a few songs. I was stunned; apart from a catchy Taiwanese traditional folk ballad ‘look forward to love’ I couldn’t think of anything else, my mind had gone completely blank. That was a sharp warning for me. I gradually came to realize that learning things from other people no matter how outstanding they, you can never win. I had no way of being like any of the other students as I had no knowledge of my own country, my motherland Taiwan and therefore felt extremely ashamed. This experience made me go back to Taiwan in 1975, and it led to a process of Taiwanese cultural soul searching.
 
Several years later, due to a job posting and because of my experiences whilst being in Europe, I was able to look at Europe in quite a different light, one outside the sphere of culture and arts. In the past, people had it in their heads this idea of a great, glorious Europe. This later changed, with the rise of America. People began to have quite a dim, bleak impression of Europe. In its endeavor to integrate, the EU once again wanted to demonstrate on the world stage its endeavors to create civilization, and this time Taiwan noticed.
 
By the 25th of March 2007, the European Union had been established for 50 years. In the 50 years Europe has developed from a common market to a European organization made up of different countries seeking similar goals, with a desire to realize common aspirations of the European people; freedom, peace and anti-war. At the same time the organization gradually became a common entity for the development of politics, economics, defense and environmental protection. After consolidation of the so-called ‘inflexible debate’ partnership, in the recent 20 years Taiwan has once again slowly drifted into educational, cultural ‘soft power’ policies. By 1992 the Maastricht Treaty fully endowed the EU with many new powers, one of which included ‘cultural policies.’ In fact a ‘cultural’ law (Article 128) was devised and became a basis for countries within the European Community to recognize and follow as a common goal in all aspects of arts and cultural collaboration.
 
Consequently we can regard the European Cultural partnership in terms of molding a ‘European label,’ Firstly, an annual proposal must be firmly established. Since 1985 the European Council have held ‘European Capital of Culture’ event. That is to say every year one or two cities with cultural touristic appeal is chosen, and performances, exhibitions and other cultural activities are held in that city. Later the EU supported and took over coordinating the entire campaign, letting these cities come to life through a colorful array of cultural and artistic activities, and as far as annual traveling goes, it became the best selling point.
 
Secondly, in the 1997 Amsterdam Treaty, Article 128 was revised and re-documented as Article 151. It emphasized the role of the EU in supporting all activities that are based on respecting and promoting European culture, this is also a legal obligation. From then on ‘culture’ became a very important issue for the EU. According to Article 151, a series of guiding cultural principals and schemes were initiated, including the 1996-1999 ‘kaleodoscope’ which was aimed at encouraging artistic and cultural creation and teamwork, the 1997-1999 ‘Ariane’ plan of book publishing and reading translations, and finally in 1997-1999 the ‘Raphael’ plan of initiating policies related to world heritage and European distinctiveness. All these activities achieved the peak of its objective by the Millennium, that is the ‘2000 Culture’ plan to reach a budget of 230 million Euros within 7 years. It provided sponsorship funds to all related cultural projects, and through advocating the sharing of different cultures, build and construct a big common cultural circle.
 
In the construction and convergence of European space for higher education, the so called ‘Bologna declaration’ received the most attention and was also the most ambitious. In 1998, Heads of educational departments in France, Germany, Britain, and Italy signed the Paris University declaration and decided on ‘academic diploma standardization’; and then in 1999 the heads of educational departments in 29 countries announced the Bologna declaration and established a common consensus for the establishment of a ‘European space for higher education.’ Later in 2000 in light of the challenges brought on by globalization and the intellectual society, EU heads of state, collectively announced in a summit their hope of completing the ideas set out in the Bologna declaration by 2010. Hence in 2001 leaders of the EU educational world discussed ways in which to initiate these plans. Not long after, heads of educational departments at the Jan Assembly made several resolutions, these include; carrying out and integrating a higher level education system, having mutual acknowledgement of each country’s academic diploma and placing special emphasis on the importance of a ‘European label’ and European dimension - in the hopes that the curriculum, and the culture on school campus can preserve and carry forward each country’s educational and strong points in learning, further demonstrating an overall distinctive nature of European culture.
 
This year March 2007, EU’s latest ‘Cultural plan: 2007-2013’ has already formally been put into action, with the slogan ‘Leap over boundaries, connect cultures’. At the same time it appropriated a budget of 400 million Euros, allowing European citizens to unite unanimously in the concept of Europeanism, and identify in each others cultures, and sharing the fruits of development.
 
The EU, in setting into motion cultural activities, most recently the inauguration of the Musee du Quai Branly in June 2006, has left a deep impression on many Taiwanese people, in other words ‘the importance and value of respecting and carrying forward diversified culture.’ There is in fact no good or bad culture, I used to say, when faced with cultural matters or related constructions one must use ‘addition’ and ‘multiplication’ to think. It is only in this way that the ‘soil of culture’ is not left barren and that ‘culture’s flower’ can bloom and flourish.
 
At the time when Taiwan ended the worlds longest martial law rule in 1987 (it lasted for 38 years), it still carried on its ‘Nativist movement’ of the 70s and the democratic human rights movement of the 80s, and did so to its full capacity. The development of Taiwanese society and Taiwanese culture created a huge upheaval; it was as if Taiwan wanted to let it all out, express all kinds of emotions and feelings concerning the past. This of course led to many conflicts, but I sincerely believe that if we have the right direction and a grasp of our core values then Taiwan can attain a positive leading force to guide it.
 
In terms of Cultural development 2000 was an important year for Taiwan. The Democratic Progressive party won the people’s support and ended Kuomintang’s 50 year long rule. Through this event the value and importance of cultural diversification became apparent. The four main ethnic groups began to have more equal treatment. In comparison Europe, in the recent ten years or so, has been in the process of seeking to share culture diversity while identifying with an integration process, I can see that Taiwan is also moving in a similar direction and I can’t help but feel very excited about this.
 
Many of those who are passionate and love this country have gone and unearthed, sorted out and rebuilt many things that were valued in the past. The government has also in terms of native language education, in national education, in developing ethnicity, and cultural activities done much for making up for all the sorrow and pain the former party had caused. Take my post as head of the Commission of Cultural Affairs of the Executive Yuan as an example. During my term there I supervised the establishment of approximately 200 local cultural centers in every county. The publications included history, literature, plays, fine arts, music etc. there were up to about 600 different kinds of historical and biographical books. These and building up Taiwan’s National literary centre, traditional art centers and Taiwanese historical museums allow Taiwan’s valuable cultural, historical relics, and archives to never again be lost, as we can preserve, protect and study them.
 
I myself feel lucky that I have the opportunity to go from a past where any discussion of ‘Taiwan’ was taboo, to the present where ‘studying Taiwan’ has now become a popular and international topic of discussion.
 
In the 80s, local historians and historical researchers in the scholarly and academic world set out to reorganize and establish a foundation for ‘Taiwanese research.’ Afterwards; elementary schools began to add native language education and native teaching materials on to the curriculum. Up until today, higher level education organizations have about 17 departments linked with the study and research of Taiwan. And I myself in 1995 wrote and published ‘100 years of Taiwanese music 1985-1995” and in 2004 after leaving a strenuous job as head of the cultural division I began to develop the discussion on “Diamond Taiwan”:
 
Taiwan only takes up 0.023% of the earth’s total area; despite this however 10 percent of the world’s distinct and diverse species reside on the island. Its unique geographic location creates wonderful natural landscapes and ecosystems. Wildlife habitat and climatic zone is first rate. Apart from that, Taiwan is home to Austronesian aborigines, who have developed their own Taiwanese mountain and sea cultures, in the past 100 years, due to a few accidental occurrences in history, they began to develop predominantly Chinese based cultural characteristics, and a blend of Western and Japanese features is also evident. This all makes Taiwan very much like a diamond, small yet beautiful and sparkly, an island not to be overlooked.
 
At the end of May 2006, the national cultural association organized a ‘the whole world loves Taiwan’ historical international seminar. Over 3 hundred years ago Taiwan was Holland’s colony, now her representative sits amongst other international scholars as an honored guest to share amongst themselves the ‘study of Taiwan.’
 
I have a French friend, she is quite an ardent student of Taiwanese anthropology, she came to Taiwan 20 years ago under the guidance of her professor. She spent years and months on a field study about the belief and social organizations and practices amongst people of Southern Taiwan. She told me things about Taiwanese religion, customs and ceremonies that I had no idea about; this made me feel deeply ashamed, and I was determined to understand and learn more about my birthplace The National Cultural organization published ‘new life water magazine’, in Jan and March 2007 also saw the publication of ’10 major Taiwanese folk rituals’ ’The 10 major rituals of Taiwanese Aborigines” This enabled me to look at Taiwan in a different light and allowed me to appreciate, understand the beauty and allure of Taiwanese culture on a more deeper and meaningful level.
 
Due to political imprisonment in the past I was unable to complete compulsory classroom ‘Taiwanese credits.’ But these past several years, private and public efforts have given me a good opportunity to make up for the loss I had incurred, and have also made me value and cherish Taiwan even more - a rare gem, a country exceptionally rich in natural resources, and a diverse cultural history.
 
To start off with I had said that Europe’s contributions to the development and rise of civilization is exceptional, from philosophy, literature, the arts, science and even the influence of most recent history’s democratic stream of thought. Europe has always been the vanguard in writing history. The EU had exerted greater efforts in recognizing and valuing the importance of cultural diversification, and has even created a new magnificent vision and plan of action, in the attempt to once again head start a new era of convergence of European values.
 
However at the same time, I deeply believe that Europeans and their knowledge and understanding of Asia, especially Taiwan is not enough. When I was young, studying in France, many classmates the same age as me told me, when they were in middle school they had never studied anything to do with Asian history, Asian thought, religion, art or ancient civilizations, it was simply not a part of their curriculum. If they wanted to know about it they had to find a way to get a hold of information. We of course know that over a half of the world’s population live in Asia, The fact that teaching materials in European schools neglect to mention Asia, means that at the time the education bureau were neglecting any dialogue between other civilizations and cultures. What is more in October 2004, I followed the Taiwanese foreign office to Britain, France, Germany, Belgium to call on governments and congressmen, and discovered that a lot of people have a very hazy impression and lack of understanding about Taiwan. But I also found that if we use the subject of culture and art to initiate communication and sharing, we would very quickly draw in the distance between us, and perhaps at the same time leave an impression and an interest in Taiwan.
 
When Europe, through education and culture reached a common understanding, established a sense of cohesiveness and identification amongst its citizens, Miles away in Taiwan; the world’s tiniest island, after experiencing political and economic reform was also seeking similar goals, and in the major process of integrating a national identity, at the same time it was also utilizing its rich cultural and artistic treasures to internally mould a common vision amongst its people, and externally to open up to the world.
 
In 2008 Taiwan will once again be electing a new president; I would like to use this opportunity to sincerely express my expectations and deepest hope that Taiwan’s future development will place culture as its core value and the importance of education as its main project. Through these elements a new vision of Taiwan can be created. In this respect we must follow in America’s footsteps and establish our own developments. At the same time we must pay attention to and observe the methods and practices that the EU take, and examine carefully not only their strategies but the philosophical background and thought, the logic and procedures that are needed to carry through their major projects, and what is more recognize its everlasting values.
 
I also deeply hope and wish that Taiwan, which has already set an example amongst the world’s overseas Chinese societies in its ability for democratic reform and cultural coherence, will be able to have more active and substantial interactions with Europe and generate greater accomplishments on the world’s cultural atlas!
 
Speech pronounced at the International Conference on "Cultural Diversity and Sustainable Development, a Dialogue between Taiwan and Europe", Kaohsiung, 25, 26 may 2007
 

Help us!

Help us keep the content of eRenlai free: take five minutes to make a donation

AMOUNT: 

Join our FB Group

Browse by Date

« October 2019 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

We have 3492 guests and no members online